Harrow Borough Council: 'Councillors are innocent until proven guilty'

Brian Gate was cautioned for possession of indecent images of children Brian Gate was cautioned for possession of indecent images of children

"By law all councillors are entitled to their basic allowance," said Harrow Borough Council's Labour group after two councillors continued claiming while criminal proceedings against them were active.

A spokesman said the fundamental principle in English Law is that people are innocent until proven guilty.

Councillor Brian Gate, former portfolio holder for children, schools and families, continued to receive £680-a-month from taxpayers despite being arrested in September last year for possession of indecent images of children.

The former cabinet member only stopped claiming the basic members’ allowance when he resigned last month, having racked up more than £2,700 since his arrest.

Independent councillor David Gawn, who pleaded guilty to fraud offences in December, also continued to claim his allowance despite a court-imposed curfew preventing him from attending council meetings for six weeks.

The politician was able to claim the cash throughout the legal proceedings against him, which dragged out over 12 months from January last year.

The Harrow on the Hill representative, who remains a member of Harrow Borough Council despite being thrown out of the Labour group over the charges, pleaded guilty in December and was sentenced to ten weeks in prison, suspended for 12 months.

The news has angered opposition councillors who say the situation is unfair on taxpayers.

Councillor Susan Hall, leader of the Harrow Conservative group, said: “I am stunned that David Gawn has not had the decency to resign.

“Their criminality is bad enough but for somebody to continue to claim taxpayers’ money is totally unacceptable.”

Cllr Hall also questioned why the Labour group had continued to receive allowances for the two councillors to support its office.

She added: "The Labour group also has serious questions to answer. If Cllr Gawn was apparently suspended from the group by the Labour Party nationally and Cllr Gate was ‘administratively suspended’, according to the previous leader, why did Labour continue to receive their allowance payments into their group budget?”

A Labour group spokesman said: “By law councillors are entitled to their basic allowance for as long as they remain an elected member. 

“Although a councillor is administratively suspended, it is a neutral act not implying guilt or innocence. 

“Allowances continue to be paid until investigations are finalised.

“Brian Gate was paid his basic allowance until he resigned as a councillor on January 9 – two days after he received a police caution.

“Cllr Gawn remains a ward councillor and is entitled to his basic allowance.

“By law Cllr Gawn may continue in his role despite his suspended sentence.

“Neither Brian Gate or Cllr Gawn are a member of the Labour Party or Harrow Labour group.

“In a previous administration, a Conservative councillor was suspended from Harrow Conservative group for a sexual offence. 

“He continued to receive his allowance as provided by law since he remained a councillor.

“He voted with Conservative group when he attended council meetings.

“Harrow allocates £3,581 per year to each councillor to support their constituency and council work which funds general office support.

“The allocation of this funding is only changed when group membership changes.”

The Labour group budget has since been reduced following Brian Gate’s resignation and Cllr Gawn becoming an independent councillor.

Comments(5)

rabbitz says...
12:30pm Thu 7 Feb 13

Thats ok but if they are proved to be guilty all monies paid after their initial arrest should be repaid in full!

starbright says...
1:54pm Thu 7 Feb 13

Someone is lying here! Harrow Times reported on the 10th October that Cllr Gate had already resigned by then following his arrest in September, and that his resignation was to be announced at the Cabinet meeting on the 11th October? If this is true then allowances should have stopped at that point. Now it is stated he resigned in January! Which one is it?

jayjoe says...
8:19am Fri 8 Feb 13

I do hope if Cllr Susan Hall is ever accused of an offence, she is grateful for the premise of innocent until proven guilty too.

1Gopher says...
8:23am Fri 8 Feb 13

He Pleade Guilty Therefore he is not innocent ergo all money should be repaid going back to when he first was charged IMBO.
Basic allownce!!!

jande76959 says...
9:37pm Fri 8 Feb 13

Unfortunately no political party can be immune to criminal or imoral or dishonest acts by people who claim to represent them, These people not only harm the victims of their acts but also parties they claim to represent, and the political process itself.

Harrow seems to have been particuarly unlucky, it was not so long ago a LibDem Council (and school governor) posted pictures of his private parts on the internet, then there was a Tory Councillor convicted of sex acts in a public toilet as well as the recent cases. Other high profiles cases at the monment are the Tory ex Leader of Barnet Council awaiting trial for a serious assult on a women and on a national level leading LibDem Chris Huhne finally admitting perverting the course of justice and resigning as an MP.

There is a temptation to say a curse on all their houses but unless people engarge in the political process then society as a whole will suffer.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree