Council pays employee £140,000 not to work (From Harrow Times)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news & views by texting Harrow Times to 80360, or email us
Harrow Borough Council pays employee £140,000 not to work
2:58pm Friday 4th January 2013 in News By Emma Innes
Harrow Borough Council has paid a former employee nearly £140,000 not to work.
The unnamed senior education officer has been paid £137,000 since he was suspended two and a half years ago.
The former employee has been paid more than £50,000 a year since he was suspended pending a police investigation.
A council spokesman said: “An employee of the council was suspended pending a 12-month investigation by the police before any charges were made and a subsequent criminal trial took place eight months later.
“The individual was acquitted but following a further council investigation is no longer an employee of the council. The length of the process was largely out of our control and this was an exceptional case.
“Harrow complies fully with employment law and aims to deal with all cases in a timely manner.
“It’s important that we always co-operate with other agencies including the police and the safeguarding authorities.
“Everyone is entitled to a fair hearing in accordance with our disciplinary policy and the law and fairness should not be sacrificed for the sake of expediency.”
Comments(8)
OKbyMe
says...
12:15am Sat 5 Jan 13
Why? An explanation has been given which is reasonable. the whole busines is daft of course but is rare. As to your example, how many others?
investigated from the top down ASAP - utterly OTT reaction
DimSum
says...
1:03pm Sat 5 Jan 13
Paul from iharrow.com
says...
12:08am Sun 6 Jan 13
http://wp.me/p1Vmm0-
3kY
It's an improvement from the average of ten and a half they took in 2007, though!
starbright
says...
12:29am Sun 6 Jan 13
ews/london/council-o
fficial-paid-137000-
not-to-work-as-inqui
ry-is-held-8435182-h
tml
The story reports about various London Councils since April last year spending £1.3 million on suspended staff. Harrow has the highest amount of suspended staff, 15 in total at a cost of £210,000 to the taxpayer so far! Harrow Council also refuse to give the evening standard details of the senior education officer involved in the article above, why I do not know? This person was charged and reported upon by the Harrow Times in June 2011, with the most serious of crimes. The following January 2012 he was acquitted therefore suspension on full pay surely should have stopped then? The Council carried on paying the individual to stay at home for another year whilst a further investigation took place? Surely we have a right to know what this further investigation was about, and whether it was a further serious allegation against said individual? How do we know that this same person now they have left did not get a pay off which has happened before with others? The Council tried to bury this story before, and are still continuing to do so? Suspended on full pay for 2 and a half years is an absolute joke and a waste of Harrow taxpayers money! The more stories I read and hear about Harrow Council the more I am disturbed about the way they seem to be adept at hiding the truth, and wasting harrow taxpayers money! Susan Hall you are obviously unhappy about this as you state in the Evening standard, so please help us the residents of Harrow to unearth the truth here!
Harrow Rani
says...
10:51am Mon 7 Jan 13
As for OKbyMe - you are exactly the type of Harrow Resident that makes it easy for the council to mis spend our money. The whole notion that becuase they have provided an explanation, it must be true, beggars belief!!!
starbright
says...
7:59pm Mon 7 Jan 13
harrow1
says...
9:14am Tue 8 Jan 13
diligaf says...
11:10pm Fri 4 Jan 13